| Creators: |
Mikael Nilsson
KMR Group, NADA, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Sweden Andy Powell Eduserv Foundation, UK Pete Johnston Eduserv Foundation, UK ambjörn_naeve KMR Group, NADA, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Sweden |
| Date Issued: | 2008-01-14 |
| Latest Version: | https://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dc-rdf/ |
| Release History: | https://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dc-rdf/release_history/ |
| Description: | This document provides recommendations for expressing Dublin Core metadata using RDF, the Resource Description Framework. |
References> Acknowledgements> Appendix A: Examples
This document provides recommendations for expressing DC metadata using RDF, the Resource Description Framework. It does this by describing how the features of the DCMI Abstract Model[ABSTRACT-MODEL] are represented using the RDF model (or abstract syntax), as defined by the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [RDF-CONCEPTS]. It does not rely on any specific RDF syntax encoding, though examples using the RDF/XML Syntax Specification [RDF-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR] are provided in Appendix A. This allows Dublin Core™ metadata to be encoded using this specification in any RDF encoding syntax or other RDF representation system, such as RDF databases.
This Recommendation replaces the following DCMI document:
Expressing Qualified Dublin Core™ in RDF / XML [DCQ-RDF-XML], a DCMI Proposed Recommendation from May 2002. This Recommendation makes the following DCMI document obsolete (while not contradicting it):
Expressing Simple Dublin Core™ in RDF/XML [DCMES-XML], a DCMI Recommendation from July 2002.
The document "Notes on DCMI specifications for Dublin Core™ metadata in RDF" [DC-RDF-NOTES] describes in more detail how this draft relates to the earlier specifications.
Many of the examples in this document make use of DCMI metadata terms [DCMI-TERMS]. See also the DCMI RDF Schemas for the DCMI terms [DCMI-SCHEMAS].
The RDF conceptual model is specified in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [RDF-CONCEPTS]. It is a relatively simple model, consisting of the following fundamentals:
An RDF graph is a set of RDF triples
An RDF triple has three components:
an RDF subject, which is an RDF URI reference or a blank RDF node
an RDF predicate, which is an RDF URI reference
an RDF object, which is an RDF URI reference, a blank RDF node or an RDF literal
An RDF literal can be of two kinds:
an RDF plain literal is a character string with an optional associated language tag describing the language of the character string
an RDF typed literal is a character string with an associated RDF datatype URI. An RDF datatype defines the syntax and semantics of a set of character strings that represent data such as booleans, integers, dates, etc. These RDF triples are connected into RDF graphs, so that a non-literal RDF object of one RDF triple may be the RDF subject of another triple.
We will use diagrams to illustrate RDF graphs (for namespace abbreviations, see Section 3). A simple triple may look like in the following figure:
![]() |
| The structure of an RDF triple. In this figure, the RDF object is an RDF typed literal |
While a graph consisting of three triples may look like the following:
![]() |
| An RDF graph consisting of three triples, connected via a blank RDF node. |
For further information on RDF, see the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [RDF-CONCEPTS], the RDF Vocabulary Description Language [RDF-SCHEMA], and http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
The following namespace abbreviations will be used in this document:
| Namespace abbreviation | Full namespace URI |
|---|---|
dc |
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ |
dcterms |
http://purl.org/dc/terms/ |
dcam |
http://purl.org/dc/dcam/ |
rdf |
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# |
xsd |
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# |
ex |
http://www.example.org/ns# (an example
namespace)
|
See also the DCMI RDF Schemas for the DCMI terms [DCMI-SCHEMAS].
This section describes how each of the constructs in the DCAM are represented in RDF. The RDF notions used here are defined in the RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax specification [RDF-CONCEPTS] and the RDF Vocabulary Description Language [RDF-SCHEMA].
DCAM descriptions and resources are represented in the following way:
A DCAM statement is represented using an RDF triple comprising:
When the DCAM value surrogate is a non-literal value surrogate, the value RDF node is an RDF URI refence or a blank RDF node, with the characteristics given below.
The following diagram illustrates the main features of the RDF representation of non-literal value surrogates.
| DC-TEXT representation | RDF graph |
|---|---|
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
![]() |
| The
representation of the DCAM
constructs in the case of a non-literal value surrogate. The notation "@en" represents an RDF language tag, while "^^ex:SubjectEncoding" represents an RDF Datatype. |
|
A DCAM value URI is represented using the RDF URI Reference of the value RDF node. If no value URI is given, the value RDF node is a blank node.
A DCAM vocabulary encoding scheme URI is represented using an RDF triple comprising:
an RDF subject that is the value RDF node.
an RDF predicate that isthe RDF URI reference dcam:memberOf
an RDF object with a corresponding RDF URI Reference being the DCAM vocabulary encoding scheme URI
A DCAM value string is represented using an RDF triplecomprising:
an RDF subject that is the value RDF node
an RDF predicate that is the RDF URI reference`` rdf:value
an RDF object that is an RDF Literal node``(either an RDF plain literal or RDF typed literal), containing the DCAM value string.
A DCAM _value string language_is represented using a language tag associated with a RDF plain literal occurring as the RDF object of this RDF triple. The language tag is constructed as defined by RFC-3066, normalized to lowercase.
A DCAM syntax encoding scheme URI is represented using the RDF datatype URI associated with a RDF typed literal occurring as the RDF object of this RDF triple.
When the DCAM value surrogate is a literal value surrogate, the value RDF node is an RDF literal node, with exactly the same chararacteristics as in the case of DCAM value strings above.
The following diagrams illustrate the main features of the RDF representation of literal value surrogates.
| DC-TEXT representation | RDF graph |
|---|---|
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
![]() |
| The
representation of the DCAM
constructs in the case of a literal value surrogate with a
language tag. The notation "@en" represents an RDF language tag. |
|
The following diagram illustrates the second case, using RDF typed literals:
| DC-TEXT representation | RDF graph |
|---|---|
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema |
![]() |
|
The
representation of the DCAM
constructs in the case of a literal value surrogate with a
Syntax Encoding Scheme URI. The notation "^^xsd:int" represents an RDF Datatype. |
|
A DCAM description set is represented as an RDF graphthat includes one or more DCAM descriptions as described above.
A DCAM value can be further described in a separate DCAM description within the same DCAM description set. This is represented in RDF by letting the value RDF node be the root of an RDF graph representing any DCAM statements in the DCAM description of the value. Thus, the value RDF nodewill be the RDF subject of a set of triples representing the DCAM description of the value.
The RDF expression of the DCMI Abstract Model has a special status among the DCMI encoding specifications. As the semantics of the notions DCMI Abstract Model is based on the semantics of the corresponding notions in RDF (as defined by [RDF-SEMANTICS]), it is of fundamental importance that the RDF expression preserves any semantics of the DCAM. Also, any valid inferences that can be made using RDF semantics need to be valid when interpreted in terms of the DCMI Abstract Model. These requirements have not yet been formalized, but are thought to be reasonable and relatively straightforward. Among other things, formulating them would require defining a reverse mapping from RDF to the DCMI Abstract Model.
The class or type of a value can be inferred in several ways:
Using the range of the corresponding property. For example, if the range of the property ex:owner is ex:Person, it can be inferred that all values of the ex:ownerproperty are of type ex:Person.
Using an explicit rdf:type statement on the value. For example, if a resource has the property rdf:type with the value ex:Person, the value can be inferred to be of the type ex:Person.
Using knowledge from the application context. For example, an application might know that it only manages reources of type ex:Book, even though this is not part of the metadata itself.
It is recommended that RDF applications use explicit rdf:typetriples, even if that means creating a separate DCAM description of the value.
The property dcterms:type has semantics very similar to rdf:type. At the time of writing, the precise relationship between those properties remains undecided.
It is recommended that RDF applications implementing this specification primarily use and understand rdf:type in place of dcterms:type when expressing Dublin Core™ metadata in RDF, as most RDF processors come with built-in knowledge of rdf:type.
Thanks to Tom Baker, the members of the DC Usage Board and the members of the DC Architecture Working Group for their comments on previous versions of this document.
The following examples use the DC-TEXT syntax [DC-TEXT] for describing examples of Dublin Core™ metadata. The corresponding RDF graph is then presented, using the RDF/XML syntax [RDF-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR]. Familiarity with the "striped" RDF/XML syntax is assumed. The W3C RDF Validator [RDF-VALIDATOR] service may be used to convert these RDF/XML samples to triples and graphs.
| Description | DC-TEXT representation | RDF/XML representation |
|---|---|---|
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a
value URI to identify the value. "The resource http://example.org/123 has the subject
identified by the URI http://example.org/taxonomy/D003.53." |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a
single value string and a vocabulary encoding scheme to describe the
value. "The resource http://example.org/123 has the subject
named 'Ornitology' from the Vocabulary Encoding Scheme http://example.org/taxonomy/MyVocab" |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a language-tagged
literal value. "The resource http://example.org/123 has the title
'Learning Biology' in english" |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a literal value with a
Syntax encoding scheme. "The resource http://example.org/person123 has the an age
of 43" |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses two
value strings, one language tagged and one using a syntax encoding
scheme, a vocabulary encoding scheme for the value and a value URI
identifying the value. "The resource http://example.org/123 has the subject from
the Vocabulary Encoding Scheme http://example.org/taxonomy/MyVocab
named 'Biology' in English and 'Biologi' in Swedish, which can be
represented using the string "EA32" according to the Syntax Encoding
Scheme http://example.org/taxonomy/SubjectEncoding, and
which is idenfified by the URI http://example.org/subject32" |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a
single value string and a value URI,
together with a description of the value. The
description of the value has two statements, each of which only has a
value URI. "The resource http://example.org/123 has the creator
identified by http://example.org/person45, represented by
the string "John Smith". The resource http://example.org/person45
is a person who has the phone number identified by tel:+358-555-1234567
(see RFC 3966)." |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a
value URI but no described resource URI. "The described resource has the subject identified by the URI http://example.org/taxonomy/D003.53." |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |
| A
description with a single statement, which uses a
value string, but no value URI. The description of the value has no
described resource URI, but has two
statements, both of which use a
value URI. "The resource http://example.org/123 has a creator
represented by the string "John Smith". The creator is a person who
has the phone number identified by tel:+358-555-1234567
(see RFC 3966)." |
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . |
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=" |